MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322741762 · doi:10.1017/aer.2022.105

Compressibility corrections to extend a smooth local correlation-based transition model to transonic flows

2023· article· en· W4322741762 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Aeronautical Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCompute CanadaUniversity of TorontoNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsTransonicCompressibilityMechanicsReynolds numberIncompressible flowPhysicsMathematicsAerodynamicsTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents progress towards a transition modelling capability for use in the numerical solution of the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations that provides accurate predictions for transonic flows and is thus suitable for use in the design of wings for aircraft flying at transonic speeds. To this end, compressibility corrections are developed and investigated to extend commonly used empirical correlations to transonic flight conditions while retaining their accuracy at low speeds. A compressibility correction for Tollmien-Schlichting instabilities is developed and applied to a smooth local correlation-based transition model and a stationary crossflow instability compressibility correction is included by adding a new crossflow source term function. Two- and three-dimensional transonic transition test cases demonstrate that the Tollmien-Schlichting compressibility correction produces substantially improved agreement with the experimental transition locations, particularly for higher Reynolds number applications where the effects of flow compressibility are expected to be more significant, such as the NASA CRM-NLF wing-body configuration, while the crossflow compressibility correction prevents an inaccurate, upstream transition front. The compressibility corrections and modifications do not significantly affect the numerical behaviour of the model, which provides an efficient alternative to non-local and higher-fidelity approaches, and can be applied to other transport-equation-based transition models with low-speed empirical correlations without affecting their predictive capability in the incompressible regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it