MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322755439 · doi:10.1520/jte20220469

Predicting the Magnitude of Microsphere Parameters Obtained from Microscopical Examination of Hardened Concrete

2023· article· en· W4322755439 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuel K. Attiogbe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Testing and Evaluation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrosphereVolume (thermodynamics)Volume fractionMaterials scienceFraction (chemistry)Magnitude (astronomy)Composite materialSpecific surface areaChemistryChromatographyThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Geometric probability concepts are used to establish a quantitative basis for predicting the magnitude of microscopically determined parameters of polymeric microsphere systems in hardened concretes relative to the actual magnitude of the parameters. Both a hypothetical discrete size distribution and a representative continuous size distribution of the microspheres are considered in the analysis. It is predicted that for a random section through the concrete, the magnitudes of the measured microsphere volume fraction and specific surface relative to the respective actual values would depend on the proportion of the total number of microspheres counted on the section. The lower the proportion of microspheres counted, the lower the ratios of measured-to-actual volume fraction and measured-to-actual specific surface would be. For the test data presented, the proportion of microspheres counted was calculated to have an average value of 0.75. Ratios of predicted-to-actual volume fraction and predicted-to-actual specific surface are compared with the respective measured ratios and found to be quite accurate. When there is a significant spread in the microsphere size distribution and relatively few microspheres are missed during a microscopical examination of a single section of concrete, the measured volume fraction would be higher and the measured specific surface would be lower, relative to the respective actual values. This is because a random section through the concrete has a greater chance of intersecting large microspheres than small ones, with large microspheres having a relatively higher contribution to volume and a relatively lower contribution to specific surface than small microspheres. These findings are relevant for air-entrained concrete as well when measurements obtained by microscopical examination of hardened concrete are compared with air content measured by the pressure method or with air content and specific surface measured by an air void analyzer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Testing and EvaluationSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207