Meserve, Margaret. Papal Bull: Print, Politics, and Propaganda in Renaissance Rome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Any review of Margaret Meserve's book will be published, printed, circulated, and finally (hopefully) read by a receptive audience.Just like the materials studied in Meserve's Papal Bull: Print, Politics, and Propaganda in Renaissance Rome, a review is a tool, one that advertises both its subject and its contribution to a wider world.However, unlike academic reviews, papal bulls had real power in early modern culture.Meserve's book is a remarkable example of how to study the papacy's preferred media of the bull, especially through the lenses of book history and political communication.She revises the study of early modern print culture and the early modern papacy, demonstrating how to think about documents with an eye to their circulation.Papal Bull argues that in the decades prior to the Lutheran Reformation, the papacy deliberately exploited the new technology of print.Meserve suggests, counter to much historiography, that the popes effectively used the new printing presses to reinforce ancient and medieval narratives of power in the worlds of early modern politics and religion.This was no easy feat.Rather than expecting literati to argue amongst themselves for the papacy's importance, the curia and its allies across Europe used the new technology to replicate, reinforce, re-create, and occasionally outright create new texts to bolster their perceived ancient authority.The papacy did this primarily through the bull, a public decree or law issued by the pope, and "Rome's most formal but also most common medium of political communication" (9).Pairing many papal bulls with other sources, Meserve shows how the popes "used print to cement their own grip on power, to stifle dissent, and to prosecute their foes" (15).The book proceeds largely chronologically, from the advent of print in Rome in 1467 to the publication of Luther's excommunication bull in 1520.The first half of the book addresses the political contexts of the papacy's use of print, while the second reveals how popes used print to define and shape their authority.The first chapter grounds print in its cultural context.Meserve describes what political communication was like in pre-print Rome, how bulls were circulated, who had authority in what spaces, and how the public responded to
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".