Martin, John Jeffries. A Beautiful Ending: The Apocalyptic Imagination and the Making of the Modern World
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Let me begin at the end.That is appropriate for a book about the making of the modern world through the apocalyptic imagination, what John Jeffries Martin calls a "Beautiful Ending." In the acknowledgments at the end of this beautifully produced book, Martin observes the beginnings of the volume and its genesis, how he found in a diffuse draft of "a history of early modern Europe from the age of Columbus to the French Revolution" a narrative that caught his attention: "the role of apocalyptic in the history of Europe and the Mediterranean from the fifteenth to the seventeenth century" (251).The book emerged unconsciously, he writes: "I hadn't self-consciously set out to work on this theme" (251).Then Martin found something that intrigued him: "Nonetheless, once this stratum emerged, I found I couldn't look away" (251).He elaborates on this fascination: "In part, I was fascinated by the hold of the apocalyptic on the imaginations of Jews, Christians, and Muslims in the early modern period" (251).This role of the apocalypse took Martin to a typology of then and now: "Moreover, this story seemed also to speak to the present with our own renewed anxieties about the End of History" (251).That anxious zeitgeist was something Francis Fukuyama explored in The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Free Press, 1992).Martin ends where he began, that is at the end of things in the early modern world from the epochal Columbian landfall to the Revolution of 1789 in France: "Above all, as I came to see, the apocalyptic imagination played not an insignificant role in the making of the modern world" (251).Imagining the end makes the future that becomes our present.Christopher Columbus and Francis Bacon are important for Martin, for the emergence of modernity.The landfall of Columbus changes the view of exploration and knowledge beyond the Pillars of Hercules.Martin says that Bacon saw crossing the Pillars as promising new knowledge of nature and the world, a "shift to modernity itself " (2).The motto Multi pertransibunt et augebitur scientia derives "from the Book of Daniel, where the phrase 'many will pass through and knowledge will be increased' pointed not to the development of secular knowledge but rather to the End of History and the final sorting of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".