MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322761313 · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2023.02.018

Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer—metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2022

2023· review· en· W4322761313 on OpenAlex
Silke Gillessen, Alberto Bossi, Ian D. Davis, Johann S. de Bono, Karim Fizazi, Nicholas D. James, Nicolas Mottet, Neal D. Shore, Eric J. Small, Matthew R. Smith, Christopher J. Sweeney, Bertrand Tombal, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Ana M. Aparicio, Andrew J. Armstrong, Gerhardt Attard, Tomasz M. Beer, Himisha Beltran, Anders Bjartell, Pierre Blanchard, Alberto Briganti, Robert G. Bristow, Muhammad Bulbul, Orazio Caffo, Daniel Castellano, Elena Castro, Heather H. Cheng, Kim N., Simon Chowdhury, Caroline S. Clarke, Noel W. Clarke, Gedske Daugaard, Maria De Santis, Ignacio Durán, Ross Eeles, Eleni Efstathiou, Jason A. Efstathiou, Onyeanunam Ngozi Ekeke, Christopher P. Evans, Stefano Fanti, Felix Y. Feng, Valérie Fonteyne, Nicola Fossati, Mark Frydenberg, Dan George, Martin Gleave, Gwénaëlle Gravis, Susan Halabi, Daniel Heinrich, Ken Herrmann, Celestia Higano, Michael S. Hofman, Lisa G. Horvath, Maha Hussain, Barbara Alicja Jereczek‐Fossa, Robert J. Jones, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Pirkko‐Liisa Kellokumpu‐Lehtinen, Raja B. Khauli, Laurence Klotz, Gero Kramer, Raja Leibowitz, Christopher Logothetis, Brandon A. Mahal, Fernando Cotait Maluf, Joaquı́n Mateo, David Matheson, Niven Mehra, Axel S. Merseburger, Amee Morgans, Michael J. Morris, Hind M’rabti, Deborah Mukherji, Declan G. Murphy, Vedang Murthy, Paul L. Nguyen, William Oh, Piet Ost, Joe M. O’Sullivan, Anwar R. Padhani, Carmel Pezaro, Darren M.C. Poon, Colin C. Pritchard, Danny Rabah, Dana E. Rathkopf, Robert E. Reiter, Mark A. Rubin, Charles J. Ryan, Fred Saad, Juan Pablo Sade, Oliver Sartor, Howard I. Scher, Nima Sharifi, Iwona Skoneczna, Howard R. Soule, Daniel E. Spratt, Sandy Srinivas, Cora N. Sternberg, Thomas Steuber, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Matthew R. Sydes, Mary‐Ellen Taplin, Derya Tilki, Levent Türkeri, Fabio Turco, Hiroji Uemura, Hirotsugu Uemura, Yüksel Ürün, Claire L. Vale, Inge M. van Oort, Neha Vapiwala, Jochen Walz, Kosj Yamoah, Dingwei Ye, Evan Y. Yu, A. Zapatero, Thomas Zilli, Aurelius Omlin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cancer · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAstellas PharmaAdvanced Accelerator ApplicationsMedical Research CouncilSanofiMovember FoundationAstraZenecaChugai PharmaceuticalDaiichi-SankyoPfizerAmgen
KeywordsCancerMedicineProstate cancerProstateOncologyCastrationInternal medicineHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation together with novel treatment options have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. However, we still lack high-level evidence in many areas relevant to making management decisions in daily clinical practise. The 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) addressed some questions in these areas to supplement guidelines that mostly are based on level 1 evidence. OBJECTIVE: To present the voting results of the APCCC 2022. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The experts voted on controversial questions where high-level evidence is mostly lacking: locally advanced prostate cancer; biochemical recurrence after local treatment; metastatic hormone-sensitive, non-metastatic, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; oligometastatic prostate cancer; and managing side effects of hormonal therapy. A panel of 105 international prostate cancer experts voted on the consensus questions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The panel voted on 198 pre-defined questions, which were developed by 117 voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. A total of 116 questions on metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer are discussed in this manuscript. In 2022, the voting was done by a web-based survey because of COVID-19 restrictions. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The voting reflects the expert opinion of these panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results are reported in the supplementary material. We report here on topics in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These voting results in four specific areas from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting and can help research funders and policy makers identify information gaps and consider what areas to explore further. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions always have to be individualised based on patient characteristics, including the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), co-morbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps where there is non-consensus and that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY: The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with healthcare providers worldwide. At each APCCC, an expert panel votes on pre-defined questions that target the most clinically relevant areas of advanced prostate cancer treatment for which there are gaps in knowledge. The results of the voting provide a practical guide to help clinicians discuss therapeutic options with patients and their relatives as part of shared and multidisciplinary decision-making. This report focuses on the advanced setting, covering metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and both non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. TWITTER SUMMARY: Report of the results of APCCC 2022 for the following topics: mHSPC, nmCRPC, mCRPC, and oligometastatic prostate cancer. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: At APCCC 2022, clinically important questions in the management of advanced prostate cancer management were identified and discussed, and experts voted on pre-defined consensus questions. The report of the results for metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer is summarised here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it