Effect of Cyclic Temperature and Fatigue Load on the Performance of Bond Strength at High-Strength Concrete–UHPC Interface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the most important components of box beam bridges is the shear key that connects the box beams together. The shear keys in box beam bridges often fail at the interface. In recent years, ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) has been successfully used to cast these shear keys. The current study investigates the effect of temperature cycles on bond performance between a high-strength concrete (HSC) box beam and UHPC shear key. The interfacial bond performance was evaluated by subjecting specimens to 60, 120, and 180 freeze-thaw (FT) cycles representing 1, 2, and 3 years of environmental exposure. Some direct tension specimens that were subjected to 180 FT cycles were additionally subjected to 1-Hz frequency fatigue cycles with stress reversals. Using the direct tension, pull-off, slant shear, and bishear assessment methods, the test results have demonstrated that the number of FT cycles did not affect bond performance in terms of strength and failure modes. The test results also showed that standard specifications underestimate the cohesion and friction coefficients evaluated using Mohr-Coulomb’s and Carol’s approaches for concrete placed against intentionally roughened surfaces. Furthermore, it was found that fatigue loading with stress reversals did not diminish the direct tensile bond strength of the specimens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".