Age as a risk factor for orthostatic hypotension induced by the levodopa challenge test in patients with Parkinson’s disease: Results from a single-center trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypotension can occur in patients receiving levodopa (L-dopa) treatment for parkinsonism. However, only few studies have focused on the characteristics of orthostatic hypotension (OH) induced by the L-dopa challenge test (LCT). This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and influencing factors of LCT-induced OH in a relatively large sample of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with PD without a previous diagnosis of OH underwent the LCT. Blood pressure (BP) in the supine and standing positions was measured before and 2 hours after the LCT. If diagnosed with OH, the patients' BP was monitored again 3 hours after the LCT. The clinical features and demographics of the patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Eight patients were diagnosed with OH 2 hours after the LCT (median dose of 375 mg L-dopa/benserazide; incidence = 10.3%). One patient without symptoms had OH 3 hours after the LCT. Compared with patients without OH, patients with OH had lower 1- and 3-minutes standing systolic BP and 1-minute standing diastolic BP at baseline and 2 hours after the LCT. Patients in the OH group were of older age (65.31 ± 4.17 years vs 59.74 ± 5.55years) and had lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores (17.5 vs 24) and higher L-dopa/benserazide levels (375 [250, 500] mg vs 250 [125, 500] mg). Older age markedly increased the odds of having LCT-induced OH (odds ratio, 1.451; 95% confidence interval, 1.055-1.995; P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: LCT increased the odds of OH in non-OH PD, causing symptomatic OH in 10.3% of patients in our study, thereby raising safety concerns. Increase in age was observed to be a risk factor for LCT-induced OH in PD patients. A study with a larger sample size is warranted to confirm our results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical Trials Registry under ChiCTR2200055707. DATE OF REGISTRATION: January 16, 2022.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".