MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P5-07-08: Evaluating the risk of cardiotoxicity associated with concurrent trastuzumab emtansine (TDM1) and radiation therapy in patients with early-stage HER2 positive breast cancer

2023· article· en· W4322769277 on OpenAlexaff
Faheem Farooq, Dillon Cason, Nisha Ohri, Shicha Kumar, Allison Grann, Anna Maria Litvak, Shridar Ganesan, Bruce G. Haffty, Deborah Toppmeyer, Coral Omene, Mridula George

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiotoxicityInternal medicineOncologyBreast cancerTrastuzumabEjection fractionTrastuzumab emtansineRadiation therapyAdjuvant therapyCardiologyHeart failureCancerChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: HER2-positive breast cancers, which accounts for 20% of breast cancers, is associated with aggressive clinical behavior and inferior survival. The approval of HER2 targeted therapy has changed the landscape of this disease and has reduced disease recurrence by 50% and has improved survival by 33%. (1) However, cardiotoxicity is a well-recognized adverse event associated with HER2-targeted therapies. Adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (TDM1) is the current standard of care for patients with residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy. TDM1 is associated with a risk of cardiotoxicity defined as a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In a pooled analysis of data from seven metastatic breast cancer trials with TDM1, the incidence of cardiac events such as congestive heart failure (CHF), cardiac ischemia, cardiac arrhythmia or grade 1/2 LVEF drop was 3.37%. Adjuvant breast radiation (RT) is routinely offered for patients at high risk for recurrence. Breast RT is also associated with long-term increased risk of cardiac disease more than 10 years after RT. The HERA trial which studied use of adjuvant trastuzumab showed that rates of cardiotoxicity were higher in patients receiving concurrent RT with trastuzumab (left sided > right sided breast cancer) compared to those who did not receive adjuvant RT, although not statistically significant. In the multivariate analysis, no treatment or baseline cardiovascular risk factors were strongly correlated with LVEF, but radiation therapy showed a borderline correlation (adjusted HR, 1.258; 95% CI, 1.00-1.58; P = .049). The risk of cardiotoxicity with concurrent TDM1 and RT has not been well studied. With increasing use of TDM1 in the adjuvant setting, it is important to understand the cardiotoxic effects of combination therapy in early-stage breast cancer. METHODS: We undertook a review of our clinical database to identify patients who received adjuvant TDM1 with concurrent RT for Stage I-III breast cancer from 1/2020 to 01/2022. Clinical parameters including age, date of diagnosis, history of cardiac disorders, echocardiogram findings, radiation dose, final pathologic stage and molecular subtypes of cancer were extracted. All patients had ejection fraction to monitor cardiac fraction. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), which is a more sensitive and reproducible indicator of cardiac dysfunction than LVEF, was also collected, if available. RESULTS: Of 32 patients identified in our retrospective analysis, two patients (6%) developed a drop in ejection fraction post radiation. Median age of patients was 57y. Majority of the patients were Caucasian (44%) followed by Hispanic (28%). 19 (60%) patients had right sided breast cancers and 13(40%) patients had left sided cancers. The mean pre-radiation ejection fraction was 60% and post radiation was 61%. Using paired t-testing, there was no statically significant difference in ejection fraction after radiation (p=0.343). Comparative GLS measurements were available for 16 patients and there was no statical difference with concurrent radiation (p=0.18). All patients tolerated radiation with mostly grade 2 skin dermatitis except four patients who had grade 3 skin dermatitis. One patient had to discontinue radiation early given grade 3 skin dermatitis. CONCLUSION: This institutional review of 32 patients suggests that adjuvant TDM1 with concurrent RT did not result in a significant change in ejection fraction or GLS. Most patients tolerated radiation without significant skin toxicities. One of the limitations of the study is the small sample size. A larger study should look at more broader conclusions; however this data has strong clinical implications. Cardiac Parameters pre and post RT Citation Format: Faheem Farooq, Dillon Cason, Nisha Ohri, Shicha Kumar, Allison Grann, Anna Litvak, Shridar Ganesan, Bruce G. Haffty, Deborah Toppmeyer, Coral Omene, Mridula A. George. Evaluating the risk of cardiotoxicity associated with concurrent trastuzumab emtansine (TDM1) and radiation therapy in patients with early-stage HER2 positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-07-08.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchFrench-language works237,207