MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4322769603 · doi:10.1111/jfs.13049

Bacterial biofilm reduction by 275 and 455 nm light pulses emitted from light emitting diodes

2023· article· en· W4322769603 on OpenAlex
Amritha Prasad, M. S. Roopesh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Safety · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta Agriculture and Forestry
KeywordsBiofilmLight-emitting diodeUltravioletSalmonellaChemistryMicrobiologyConfocal laser scanning microscopyMaterials scienceBacteriaOptoelectronicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Eradication of biofilms from the food contact surfaces is a challenging task, owing to their increased resistance to sanitizers and regular cleaning practices. The treatment with the light pulses emitted from the light emitting diode (LED) is an emerging surface decontamination technology, that can produce the antibiofilm effect by photodynamic inactivation. The objective of this study was to understand the antibiofilm efficacy of the 275 (Ultraviolet‐C [UV‐C]) and 455 nm (Blue) light pulses emitted from the LEDs against single and dual‐species biofilms of Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC13311 and Aeromonas australiensis 03‐09 on stainless steel (SS) coupons formed at different time. The biofilm formation by S . Typhimurium was improved when grown with A. australiensis in dual‐species culture. Both 275 and 455 nm light pulses showed significant antibiofilm activity against S. Typhimurium and A. australiensis in single and dual‐species biofilms. For instance, the 275 nm LED treatment of surfaces of SS coupons with 1.8 J/cm 2 dose on each surface, produced reductions of 4.24 and 3.9 log (CFU/cm 2 ) in single (cell attachment) and dual‐species biofilms of S. Typhimurium, and reductions of 4.45 and 4.99 log (CFU/cm 2 ) in single and dual‐species biofilms of A. australiensis . However, the susceptibility of A. australiensis toward 455 nm LED treatments was influenced by the presence of S. Typhimurium in the dual‐species biofilm. The confocal laser scanning microscopy images revealed significant cell membrane damage in the dual‐species biofilms by the LED treatments with 275 and 455 nm light pulses. Overall, several factors like surface temperature increase, strains used, treatment dose, treatment time, and incubation period of biofilms influenced the inactivation efficacy of the 275 and 455 nm LED treatments against the biofilms formed on SS coupons. This study provides an insight into the inactivation efficacy of LED light pulses against bacterial biofilms on food grade SS surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it