Challenges in Understanding Western Economic and Financial Concepts from the Perspective of Young Adults with a Post-Soviet Migration Background in Germany—Findings from a Qualitative Interview Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The content of economic education in Germany is based largely on the laws and ideals of the prevailing economic system. While Western concepts such as the competitive market typically are addressed in economic programs in Germany, they may be unfamiliar in Eastern European countries that were part of, or under the influence of, the former Soviet Union, where many youths living in Germany originate. Findings from large-scale quantitative studies of economic and financial literacy in Germany indicate that people who have a migration background (MB) perform worse on tests of economic literacy than those who do not; however, these studies do not provide sufficient insight into the underlying migration-related causes of the deficits in economic literacy. In this study we investigate the influence of family financial socialization on young adults’ understanding of economic and financial concepts. We interview eight young adults with a post-Soviet MB living in Germany using a two-part procedure: problem-centered and think-aloud interviews. We found that migrant parents directly and indirectly influenced their children’s understanding of economic and financial concepts in numerous ways, and we maintain that the best way to remedy the deficits in their understanding of such concepts is through targeted programs and teacher training.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".