MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323026931 · doi:10.2991/978-2-38476-018-3_54

A Review of Survival Analysis Theory and Its Application

2023· review· en· W4323026931 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yulu Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marshall McLuhan, a famous Canadian communication scientist, has proposed a far-reaching view of media: media and information.Emphasizing that the media itself is the truly meaningful information, the basic driving force for social development, and the symbol to distinguish between different social forms.With the advent of the Internet era and the development of modern science and technology, people fragmented reading habits, short video as different from text, pictures, audio of a new media form, has become the audience, an important means, is gradually transformed into people's daily life, by the academic and industry, so myopic, frequency news as a new product under the background of the mobile Internet era, the research, has a strong practical significance and theoretical value.Most of the existing research on micro-documentaries focuses on the innovative exploration and narrative strategies in the era of financial media.This paper takes the fourth season of Momstant China as the analysis object, and adopts the sample analysis method and the literature research method to explore how micro-documentaries reflect on the form of the creation or the content of the audience, so as to help the creators achieve the best communication effect in the following works.It introduced the relevant concepts and meanings of the survival analysis method, and uses the hazard rate function, cumulative distribution function, survival function, and cumulative hazard rate function to describe the concept of survival time.Secondly, the application of survival analysis method in various industries at home and abroad is reviewed.Through the review of domestic and foreign applications, it is found that although the survival analysis method was first only applied in the medical field, it has been widely used by more and more scholars in other fields due to its advantages in processing the censored data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.332
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207