The Effect of Psychological Utility of Beauty Care Behavior on the Stress Relief of Silver Women: Mediating Effects of Physical Respect
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of psychological utility of beauty care behavior on stress relief in women over 50 years old, and to examine the mediating effect of physical respect in the relationship between these variables. In this survey, women over 50 years of age residing nationwide were selected as the population. In addition, women in their 50s and older in the Seoul metropolitan area were selected as a sample group, and an online survey was conducted for about 4 weeks from September 2022 to the sample group. The research results are as follows. First, it was found that diversion, confidence, and self esteem, which are sub-factors of psychological utility of beauty care behavior, had a significant positive (+) effect on physical respect. Second, it was found that physical respect had a significant positive (+) effect on stress relief. Third, it was found that diversion, confidence, and self esteem, which are sub-factors of psychological utility of beauty care behavior, had a significant positive (+) effect on stress relief. Fourth, the mediating effect of physical respect was confirmed in the relationship between psychological utility and stress relief of beauty care behavior. In conclusion, it was confirmed that the beauty care behavior of silver women over 50 had a significant effect on their psychological factors, and in particular, it was found that the formation of physical respect was important.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".