EKSISTENSI KELOMPOK WANITA TANI “MANDIRI SEJAHTERA” (STUDI KASUS DI DESA BOJONGMANGU, KABUPATEN BEKASI)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Existence of “Mandiri Sejahtera” Women Farmers Group (Case Study in Bojongmangu Village, Bekasi). The purpose of this research is to understand the existence of Kelompok Wanita Tani “Mandiri Sejahtera” in the middle of rapid industrial expansion. This research was conducted in Desa Bojongmangu, Kecamatan Bojongmangu, Kabupaten Bekasi. The techniques that used to collect data were observation and interview. The interviews were conducted with members of KWT “Mandiri Sejahtera”. The result of this research showed that the existence of KWT “Mandiri Sejahtera” in the middle of industrial expansion was well empowered by the government. The success of the empowerment was proven by the fact that KWT “Mandiri Sejahtera” won the Peningkatan Peran Wanita Menuju Keluarga Sehat & Sejahtera (P2WKSS) program that were held at province. The existence of KWT “Mandiri Sejahtera” also gave financial supports for the members. The government tried to apply the bottom-up system by considered the people need’s first. Even though the industrial expansion was still implemented, the government did not forget to improve the agricultural sector. One of many ways to improve agricultural sector was by empowering Kelompok Wanita Tani “Mandiri Sejahtera”. Keywords: women farmer group, industry, empowerment, government
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".