Mindful and Compassionate Self, Grounded Together: A Qualitative Description of Postmenopausal Women’s Perceptions of Balance Flow Yoga
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Yoga has promising benefits for women to reduce fall-injury risk by improving balance, strength, confidence, and other risk factors, although the effect of yoga on reducing injury risk and fall rates is still not clearly established. The objective of the present study was to determine postmenopausal women's perceived changes in overall health and well-being and some of the facilitators and challenges to participating in a 12-week Balance Flow Yoga class, a group-based hatha yoga intervention designed specifically to address fall risk factors. Thirty-six women 50-70 years of age participated in an intervention study consisting of 12 weeks of a control period followed by 12 weeks of twice-weekly hatha Balance Flow Yoga in a community yoga studio. Twenty-three women and four yoga instructors/trainers participated in focus group discussions after the intervention was completed. Discussion was audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed through inductive thematic analysis by three researchers, a student trainee, and a research assistant. Two overarching themes and four subthemes were revealed. The two overarching themes Mindful and Compassionate Self and Grounded Together represented participants' perceptions of personal growth and their approach to living and the sense of community support and connection. Four interrelated subthemes were Creating a Safe Space; Sense of Community and Commitment; Benefits: Physical and Beyond ; and Balancing Individual Needs. This study demonstrated perceptions of physical, emotional, and social benefits after 12 weeks of Balance Flow Yoga; these benefits could influence women's health, wellness, and future fall risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".