GPTree Cluster: phylogenetic tree cluster generator in the context of supertree inference
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary: For many years, evolutionary and molecular biologists have been working with phylogenetic supertrees, which are oriented acyclic graph structures. In the standard approaches, supertrees are obtained by concatenating a set of phylogenetic trees defined on different but overlapping sets of taxa (i.e. species). More recent approaches propose alternative solutions for supertree inference. The testing of new metrics for comparing supertrees and adapting clustering algorithms to overlapping phylogenetic trees with different numbers of leaves requires large amounts of data. In this context, designing a new approach and developing a computer program to generate phylogenetic tree clusters with different numbers of overlapping leaves are key elements to advance research on phylogenetic supertrees and evolution. The main objective of the project is to propose a new approach to simulate clusters of phylogenetic trees defined on different, but mutually overlapping, sets of taxa, with biological events. The proposed generator can be used to generate a certain number of clusters of phylogenetic trees in Newick format with a variable number of leaves and with a defined level of overlap between trees in clusters. Availability and implementation: A Python script version 3.7, called GPTree Cluster, which implements the discussed approach, is freely available at: https://github.com/tahiri-lab/GPTree/tree/GPTreeCluster.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it