Computational design and experimental verification of pseudoknotted ribozymes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The design of new RNA sequences that retain the function of a model RNA structure is a challenge in bioinformatics because of the structural complexity of these molecules. RNA can fold into its secondary and tertiary structures by forming stem–loops and pseudoknots. A pseudoknot is a set of base pairs between a region within a stem–loop and nucleotides outside of this stem–loop; this motif is very important for numerous functional structures. It is important for any computational design algorithm to take into account these interactions to give a reliable result for any structures that include pseudoknots. In our study, we experimentally validated synthetic ribozymes designed by Enzymer, which implements algorithms allowing for the design of pseudoknots. Enzymer is a program that uses an inverse folding approach to design pseudoknotted RNAs; we used it in this study to design two types of ribozymes. The ribozymes tested were the hammerhead and theglmS, which have a self-cleaving activity that allows them to liberate the new RNA genome copy during rolling-circle replication or to control the expression of the downstream genes, respectively. We demonstrated the efficiency of Enzymer by showing that the pseudoknotted hammerhead andglmSribozymes sequences it designed were extensively modified compared to wild-type sequences and were still active.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".