Assessment of Water Quality of Shatt al Arab River in north of Basra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study was aimed to ecological evolution for the north part of Shatt Al Arab River, by using water quality index (WQI, Canadian Model) because the efficiency of this method to volutes fresh water quality and to determinate the water quality for different uses. This study has been done through the period between December, 2012 to November, 2013; samples were collected monthly during low tide, three stations have been chosen, the first one was near Al Hartha area, the second station was near Al Hartha area and the third station was near Saeed Ali Al Noor Bridge. The present results were showed that water temperature were ranged between 13.8 ºC – 37 ºC and dissolved solids were 100—1670 mg/l, , salinity range were 0.6-2.5 ‰, the range of dissolved oxygen was 5.7-10.7 mg/l, the hardness value was range between 500-1120 mg magnesium ions was 35-93 mg/l, nitrite was 3.5-15 μg nitrogen atom-nitrate/l, the range of phosphate was 0.05-0.5 μg phosphor atom-phosphate /l, phosphorous range was 158-536 mg/l, the range number of faucal bacterial colon was 21-495 CFU/100ml. Water quality index values (WQI) for all study stations, the range was 47-67, these were classified between third (Fair) and fourth (Marginal) categories. Classification of stations was fair for the first station and marginal for the second and third stations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".