MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323262293 · doi:10.1353/aq.2023.0002

Indigenous Brooklyn: Ironworking, Little Caughnawaga, and Kanien'kehá:ka Nationhood in the Twentieth Century

2023· article· en· W4323262293 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Allan Downey

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Quarterly · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousModernityHistoryGender studiesGeographyEthnologySociologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unknown to most people who are accustomed to speak with condescending pity of the American Indian as a dying and vanishing race in the struggle for existence, a respectable little company of real aboriginal redmen lives and thrives in the midst of New York City, the heart of the most complex civilization in the world, where competition between individuals and racial types is fiercest, prices highest, rent steepest, and conditions of living in general as far from the conditions in which the early Indians lived as anything could be. And yet, somehow, these Indians have managed to adapt themselves to the conditions they find around them making an honest living and a good one, and winning the respect of their neighbors on their merits as members of the community irrespective of their descent from the quondam owners and rulers of the land . . . Joe Delile [Delisle?] of the Iroquois descent, and from the St. Regis Reservation [Ahkweshsne] in Northern New York, is a structural ironworker in the city, and Walter Deer of the Caughnawaga [Kahnaw:ke] is hewing his way here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0310.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican QuarterlySame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207