Investigation of the dual-task performance and affecting factors in female patients with fibromyalgia syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies report that dual-task (DT) performance might be affected in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). This cross-sectional study aims to compare the DT performance in female patients with FMS and healthy controls, and to investigate the DT-related factors in these patients. This study was conducted at a university hospital between November 2021 and April 2022. Forty females aged 30–65, diagnosed with FMS, and 40 aged-matched pain-free healthy controls were included. All participants performed the Timed Up and Go Test under a single task (ST) and a cognitive DT condition, and the DT cost was calculated. The following evaluations were applied; The six-minute walk test, Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20, Toronto Alexithymia Scale, Trail Making Test, and the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. As a result of the study, the patient group showed lower performance than controls in both, ST and DT conditions (p < .05). Disease duration, pain and fatigue severity, functional capacity, leisure time and physical activity total scores, alexithymia scores, health status, and cognitive variables were correlated with DT performance in the patient group (p < .05). According to our results, we consider that the rehabilitation approach for females with FMS should take into account DT and related characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".