MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323295430 · doi:10.1017/s104161022200103x

Reduction and prevention of agitation in persons with neurocognitive disorders: an international psychogeriatric association consensus algorithm

2023· review· en· W4323295430 on OpenAlexafffund
Jeffrey L. Cummings, Mary Sano, Stefanie Auer, Sverre Bergh, Corinne E. Fischer, Debby L. Gerritsen, George T. Grossberg, Zahinoor Ismail, Krista L. Lanctôt, Maria I. Lapid, Jacobo Mintzer, Rebecca Palm, Paul B. Rosenberg, Michael Splaine, Kate Zhong, Carolyn W. Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Psychogeriatrics · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute on AgingGenentechHealth Resources and Services AdministrationNational Institutes of HealthH. Lundbeck A/SNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNovo NordiskJazz PharmaceuticalsACADIA PharmaceuticalsEisaiAustrian Science FundFondation Brain CanadaBiogenAlzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
KeywordsPsychosocialPsychological interventionPsychomotor agitationAkathisiaPsychiatryOperationalizationPsychologyMedicineAlgorithmAntipsychoticSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To develop an agitation reduction and prevention algorithm is intended to guide implementation of the definition of agitation developed by the International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA). DESIGN: Review of literature on treatment guidelines and recommended algorithms; algorithm development through reiterative integration of research information and expert opinion. SETTING: IPA Agitation Workgroup. PARTICIPANTS: IPA panel of international experts on agitation. INTERVENTION: Integration of available information into a comprehensive algorithm. MEASUREMENTS: None. RESULTS: The IPA Agitation Work Group recommends the Investigate, Plan, and Act (IPA) approach to agitation reduction and prevention. A thorough investigation of the behavior is followed by planning and acting with an emphasis on shared decision-making; the success of the plan is evaluated and adjusted as needed. The process is repeated until agitation is reduced to an acceptable level and prevention of recurrence is optimized. Psychosocial interventions are part of every plan and are continued throughout the process. Pharmacologic interventions are organized into panels of choices for nocturnal/circadian agitation; mild-moderate agitation or agitation with prominent mood features; moderate-severe agitation; and severe agitation with threatened harm to the patient or others. Therapeutic alternatives are presented for each panel. The occurrence of agitation in a variety of venues-home, nursing home, emergency department, hospice-and adjustments to the therapeutic approach are presented. CONCLUSIONS: The IPA definition of agitation is operationalized into an agitation management algorithm that emphasizes the integration of psychosocial and pharmacologic interventions, reiterative assessment of response to treatment, adjustment of therapeutic approaches to reflect the clinical situation, and shared decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.008
Bibliometrics0.0080.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0100.006
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.383 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational PsychogeriatricsSame topicHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsFrench-language works237,207