MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323295435

Features: Diagnostic Ophthalmology.

2023· article· en· W4323295435 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lynne S Sandmeyer, Marina L. Leis

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptometryOphthalmologyComputer scienceMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

History and clinical signsA n 11-month-old crossbred Bernese mountain dog was examined by the ophthalmology service at the Western College of Veterinary Medicine.This dog presented for evaluation of an abnormal appearing third eyelid of the right eye.The menace responses, and palpebral, oculocephalic, direct and consensual pupillary light reflexes were normal bilaterally.Schirmer tear test (Schirmer Tear Test Strips; Alcon Canada, Mississauga, Ontario) values were 20 and 22 mm/min in the right and left eyes, respectively.Intraocular pressures were estimated with a rebound tonometer (Tonovet; Tiolat, Helsinki, Finland) and were 12 and 13 mmHg in the right and left eyes, respectively.Fluorescein staining (Fluorets; Bausch & Lomb Canada, Markham, Ontario) of the cornea was negative in both eyes.Retropulsion of both globes was unremarkable.On direct examination, including palpation and exteriorization of the third eyelid, the leading edge of the third eyelid in the right eye was folded anteriorly due to an outward curvature in the third eyelid cartilage.Following application of 0.5% tropicamide (Mydriacyl; Alcon Canada, Mississauga, Ontario), examination of both eyes using a transilluminator (Welch Allyn Finoff Transilluminator; Welch Allyn, Mississauga, Ontario) and handheld biomicroscope (Kowa SL-17 Portable Slit Lamp; Kowa Co Tokyo, Japan) revealed no abnormalities.Indirect ophthalmoscopic (Heine Omega 500; Heine Instruments Canada, Kitchener, Ontario) examination was completed and did not reveal abnormalities in either eye.A photograph of the right eye at presentation is provided for your assessment (Figure 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.733
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicRetinal and Optic ConditionsFrench-language works237,207