MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323309118 · doi:10.3386/w31007

Remote Work across Jobs, Companies, and Space

2023· report· en· W4323309118 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen Hansen, Peter J. Lambert, Nicholas Bloom, Steven J. Davis, Raffaella Sadun, Bledi Taska

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Bureau of Economic Research · 2023
Typereport
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Economy and Work Transformation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCommonwealth Scholarship CommissionHarvard Business SchoolLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceUniversity of ChicagoJohn Templeton Foundation
KeywordsFlaggingWork (physics)Space (punctuation)Computer scienceZoomData scienceWorld Wide WebBusinessArtificial intelligenceMarketingGeographyEngineeringCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pandemic catalyzed an enduring shift to remote work. To measure this shift, this paper develops a large language model (LLM), fine tunes and assesses it using 30,000 human classifications, and applies it to nearly 600 million job vacancy postings across five English-speaking countries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.453
GPT teacher head0.553
Teacher spread0.100 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Bureau of Economic ResearchSame topicDigital Economy and Work TransformationFrench-language works237,207