Marketplace channel encroachment under private brand introduction of online platform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the marketplace channel introduction of contract manufacturers and the response of the platform with an option to introduce a private brand. We develop a game-theoretical model to examine a three-tier e-commerce supply chain including a contract manufacturer (CM), an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and a platform and derive the equilibrium results. We find that the marketplace channel introduction of the CM and the platform's private brand introduction influence each other. More specifically, marketplace channel encroachment may discourage the platform from introducing a private brand, and this preference is reinforced as the referral fee increases. Interestingly, the introduction of the platform's private brand increases the likelihood of contract manufacturer encroachment, which is mediated by the difference between the two private brands of the CM and platform--as the difference increases, the CM prefers to enter the marketplace channel. Furthermore, only contract manufacturer encroachment (or private brand introduction for the platform) can always benefit the whole supply chain, but the supply chain may be hurt when the platform and the CM perform their strategies simultaneously. In the extension section, in addition to demonstrating the validity of our main results when the CM and the OEM act as a single entity, we also find that the first-mover advantage of the platform may reduce the possibility of the contract manufacturer encroachment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".