A278 SEX DIFFERENCES IN THE EFFECT OF THE MICROBIOTA FROM IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME PATIENTS ON ABDOMINAL PAIN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic abdominal pain disorder that affects women twice as often as men. The gut microbiota has been implicated as a key player in the modulation of abdominal pain in IBS. Given this, we hypothesised that the production of pro-nociceptive mediators within the gut lumen are increased in females, and this contributes to the female predominance of IBS. Purpose Compare the effects of FS from male and female IBS patients on abdominal pain pathways and identify the impact of female mouse estrous cycle on abdominal pain. Method Fecal supernatants (FS) were perfused through murine colonic preparations while performing extracellular colonic afferent nerve recordings to measure changes in action potential frequency in response to colonic distension. Phase of estrous cycle in female mice was determined through vaginal swabs. FS from male and female IBS patients reporting low, moderate, and high levels of abdominal pain were used. Result(s) FS from female IBS patients (N=6) increased afferent nerve discharge (p < 0.05) whereas FS from male IBS patients has no effect (N=4). However, single unit analysis of nociceptive axons revealed that male IBS FS increased nociceptor activity in female mice taken during the proestrus/estrus stage (p < 0.05), but not female mice taken during the metestrus/diestrus stage or male mice. Further investigation found that IBS FS from female patients with high abdominal pain (N=6), but not patients with moderate (N=5) or low pain (N=3), increased visceral afferent nerve discharge by 70%. Single unit analysis of nociceptive axons showed that their activation was increased by almost 50% following FS perfusion from high abdominal pain patients only (p < 0.05). Histamine concentrations and proteolytic activity are increased in FS from female IBS patients with high abdominal pain compared to male IBS patients. Conclusion(s) This work suggests that luminal mediators that impact abdominal pain are increased in female IBS patients compared to male IBS patients, and females appear to be more sensitive to their pro-nociceptive effects. Together, these sex differences may contribute to the female predominance of IBS. Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".