MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4323350699 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.230

A230 A MISSENSE MUTATION IN GOBLET CELL PROTEIN FCGBP ALTERS THE GLYCOMIC PROFILE AND FUNCTION OF THE COLONIC MUCUS BARRIER

2023· article· en· W4323350699 on OpenAlexaff
Hayley Gorman, France Moreau, W Zandberg, K Bergstrom, Kris Chadee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMucinMucusGoblet cellMucin 2BiologyGlycosylationCell biologyMissense mutationGlycoproteinChemistryMutationMolecular biologyEpitheliumBiochemistryGeneticsGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background MUC2 mucin, produced by colonic goblet cells, forms a mucus bilayer that provides a physical barrier between potential pathogens in the lumen and the underlying epithelial cells. Mucus is thus the first line of innate host defense in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Many GI diseases including inflammatory bowel disease and colon cancer affect the glycosylation of mucus. Goblet cells produce a variety of proteins that are associated with the mucus layer. Of these proteins, FCGBP is of significant interest due to its structural similarities to MUC2 mucin with unknown functions. In this study, we investigated how a missense mutation in FCGBP altered the glycosylation of goblet cell MUC2 and affected its barrier functions. Purpose Hypothesis: A missense mutation in FCGBP results an impaired mucus layer by the altering glycomic profiles of goblet cell mucins. Specific aims: 1) To determine mechanistically how FCGBP impeded the structural integrity of the mucus layer 2) To quantify MUC2 glycoprotein modifications in the altered mucus layer Method To investigate whether FCGBP impaired mucus barrier functions, two cell types were investigated: wildtype LS174T (WT) MUC2 mucus-producing goblet cells and LS174T cells with a missense mutation in FCGBP (FCGBP MS). To determine if FCGBP MS led to loss in barrier function in the mucus layer, the penetration of 0.2, 1, and 2 μm fluorescent beads (to mimic bacteria) through the mucus layer were quantified. To determine if the differences in penetrability were caused by differences in MUC2 glycosylation in the goblet cell lines, sensitive glycomic analyses were performed by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) and capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection (CE-LIF). Both intact cells and isolated MUC2 mucin granules were analyzed. To determine if differences in the glycomic profiles was caused by differences in glycotransferases, RT-PCR was performed on over 30 human glycosyltransferases. Result(s) FCGBP MS cells exhibited significant loss in MUC2 mucus barrier function as quantified by fluorescent beads penetration through the mucus layer in a temporal manner. FCGBP MS cells exhibited an altered glycomic profile with a notable increase in sialylated glycans as quantified by HPLC-MS. The increase in sialylated glycans was associated with a significant increase in sialyl-transferase expression in FCGBP MS cells. Conclusion(s) These data demonstrate that a single missense mutation in FCGBP altered the penetrability of the mucus layer associated with an increase in sialylated proteins, a signature hallmark of numerous colonic diseases. FCGBP was critical in providing structural integrity of the mucus layer and maintenance of goblet cell glycosylation profiles. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below CIHR Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicGlycosylation and Glycoproteins Research→French-language works237,207→