MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323350705 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.179

A179 MECHANISMS OF ACTION INVOLVED IN THE WOUND HEALING EFFECT OF THE DIETARY FIBRE RHAMNOGALACTURONAN

2023· article· en· W4323350705 on OpenAlexaff
Cristiane Hatsuko Baggio, Jinsai Shang, Antonia Maiara Marques do Nascimento, Thales R. Cipriani, Wallace K. MacNaughton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Biology and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWound healingApoptosisSignal transductionLY294002PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayChemistryCaco-2Barrier functionCancer researchPharmacologyCell biologyMedicineMolecular biologyCellBiologyImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic and relapsing inflammatory conditions associated with impaired intestinal epithelial barrier. Mucosal healing is the primary goal for IBD treatment since it is a good predictor of clinical remission. We previously showed the direct beneficial effects of rhamnogalacturonan (RGal), a polysaccharide isolated from the plant Acmella oleracea, on intestinal epithelial barrier function with participation of TLR4 and PKC activation. RNAseq data and pathway analysis have indicated the involvement of the canonical nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) signaling pathway. Purpose We hypothesize that RGal increases intestinal epithelial wound healing through FAK-Src/PI3K/NF-kB signaling pathways. Method Caco-2 and T84 cells, and human primary cell monolayers grown from ulcerative colitis patient-derived organoids, were wounded and treated with vehicle (media or 0.5% DMSO in media) or RGal (1000 μg/ml) for 48 h. Wound healing was assessed using either the IncuCyte or ImageXpress Pico live cell imaging systems. Proliferation and apoptosis of cells were evaluated using EdU and TUNEL assays, respectively. Inhibitors were added at the same time (transcription inhibitor Actinomycin D, 5 μg/ml) or 1 h (FAK inhibitor FAK-14, 10 μM, Src inhibitor PP2, 5 μM, PI3K inhibitor LY294002, 20 μM, NF-kB inhibitors Bay 11-7082 and JSH-23, 10 and 20 μM, respectively, or COX-2 inhibitor NS-398, 20 μM) before RGal treatment. Unwounded Caco-2 monolayers treated with RGal (1000 μg/ml) were collected for Western blotting for COX-2 protein. Result(s) In the wound healing assay, RGal (1000 μg/ml) enhanced wound healing by 12.5% at 48 h in Caco-2 cells and by 14.7% at 24 h in T84 cells, compared to control group. RGal (1000 μg/ml) also accelerated the wound closure in colonoid monolayers obtained from ulcerative colitis patient biopsies by 81.3% at 48 h. Neither proliferation nor apoptosis were involved in the RGal effect on wound healing. Treatment of cells with FAK14 (10 μM), PP2 (5 μM), and PI3K (20 μM) significantly prevented the RGal-induced wound healing. Actinomycin D (5 μg/ml), Bay 11-7082 (10 μM) or JSH-23 (20 μM) treatment significantly reversed the effect of RGal on wound healing, showing that the response was transcriptionally dependent and involved NF-kB signaling. Treatment of cells with NS-398 (20 μM) also reversed the effect of RGal on wound healing. COX-2 protein expression was significantly increased at 6 and 12 h after RGal addition to Caco-2 monolayers. Conclusion(s) These data suggest that the plant-based polysaccharide RGal increases intestinal epithelial cell wound healing by increasing cell migration. The RGal effect is dependent on the activation of the FAK-Src/PI3K signaling pathways and subsequently the transcription factor NF-kB and downstream COX-2 protein expression and activity. Our findings show a novel mechanism of action of RGal in wound healing that could help in the resolution of intestinal inflammation and mucosal healing. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below Other Please indicate your source of funding; NSERC Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicFungal Biology and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207