MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4323350752 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.283

A283 ROLE OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN E IN ABDOMINAL PAIN DUE TO INTERACTIONS BETWEEN DIET AND STRESS IN A MODEL OF IBS

2023· article· en· W4323350752 on OpenAlexaff
C. López-López, J Jaramillo Polanco, Quentin Tsang, Alan Lomax, S Vanner, David E. Reed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvalbuminImmunoglobulin EIleumHistamineSensitizationRheobaseMedicineDorsal root ganglionIrritable bowel syndromeImmunologyMast cellEndocrinologyInternal medicineChemistryAntibodyImmune systemDepolarizationAnatomyDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Food and stress are common triggers of symptoms in IBS patients. We previously showed in a murine model of IBS that exposure to a food antigen during a period of psychological stress leads to visceral hypersensitivity in both the ileum and colon upon re-exposure to the food antigen. This was inhibited by blocking mast cells and histamine receptors, suggesting that mast cell activation is involved in this increased pain signaling. However, it is unknown if immunoglobulin E (IgE) is involved in the activation of mast cells leading to visceral hypersensitivity. Purpose Determine the role of IgE in the increased pain signaling in ileum and colon of mice re-exposed to ovalbumin after an initial exposure to ovalbumin during chronic stress. Method Balb/c mice underwent water avoidance stress (WAS) for 10 days and were exposed to ovalbumin (OVA) from days 2-10. Five weeks later, mice were re-exposed to ovalbumin for two weeks (WAS/OVA+OVA mice). Mice were injected with anti-mouse IgE or isotype control antibody (1 mg/kg, i.p.) just prior and during ovalbumin re-exposure. Ex-vivo extracellular afferent recordings from nerves innervating the ileum were obtained to assess changes in mechanosensitivity. Ileum and colonic supernatants were also collected. Dorsal root ganglion neurons (DRG) from control mice (n = 12) were incubated with ileal and colonic supernatants. The excitability of these neurons was assessed by measuring the rheobase (minimum current required to evoke an action potential; lower rheobase=increased excitability) using perforated patch clamp. Data were analyzed by unpaired t-test or two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post hoc test. Result(s) WAS/OVA+OVA mice treated with anti-IgE antibody had decreased mechanosensitivity of ileal nerves following lumen distention compared to WAS/OVA+OVA mice treated with isotype control antibody (7.7 ± 0.65 vs 12.9 ± 1.04 Hz, p = 0.034, n = 9 and 8 mice, respectively). Ileal supernatants from anti-IgE treated WAS/OVA+OVA mice evoked lower excitability (higher rheobase) in DRG neurons than neurons incubated with supernatants from isotype control treated WAS/OVA+OVA mice (rheobase: 89.2 ± 4.7 vs 71.9 ± 5.1 pA, p= 0.018). Colonic supernatants showed similar effects of the anti-IgE treatment (rheobase: 95.5 ± 4.4 vs 76.7 ± 5.4 pA, p = 0.01). Conclusion(s) IgE is involved in the increased pain signaling observed in both ileum and colon induced by antigen re-exposure following an initial stress-food antigen interaction. This suggests that IgE-mediated mast cell activation in response to food antigens may be a mechanism of meal-induced pain in IBS patients. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below Other Please indicate your source of funding; Department of Medicine, Translational Medicine Grant, Queen's University Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicGastrointestinal motility and disorders→French-language works237,207→