MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323350770 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.147

A147 “ALREADY GLUTEN-FREE”: A CASE REPORT AND INTERNAL REVIEW OF CHALLENGES IN THE DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP FOR CHILDREN WITH CELIAC DISEASE

2023· article· en· W4323350770 on OpenAlexaff
N Lepore, Mary Zachos, J Dowhanjk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePediatric gastroenterologyIron-deficiency anemiaAnemiaGastroenterologyGluten freeCoeliac diseaseInternal medicineTissue transglutaminaseIron deficiencyReferralWork-upDiseaseBiopsyHelicobacter pylori

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background A single positive tissue transglutaminase IgA (TTG) result does not diagnose celiac disease (CeD). Starting a gluten free diet (GFD) without the proper approach to diagnosis can result in misdiagnosis and inappropriate lifelong gluten restriction. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection can be a mimicker of CeD symptomatically, biochemically, and histologically. Purpose We report a case of a patient referred for CeD with a false-positive TTG and severe iron deficiency anemia who had started a GFD at the time of referral. Method In addition to the case review, we reviewed referrals for possible CeD from June 1 to September 1, 2022 at McMaster Children’s Hospital to identify the proportion of patients started on a partial or full GFD before their initial gastroenterology consultation. Result(s) Case Report: A 10-year-old female was referred for a positive TTG result 6x the upper limit of normal (72 U/mL; ULN 12U/mL) and iron deficiency anemia with a hemoglobin (Hb) of 85 and MCV of 62. She had been informed her blood work was diagnostic for CeD and to start a GFD prior to referral to Pediatric Gastroenterology. At the time of consultation she had symptoms of GERD, diarrhea, and epigastric pain. Following her consultation, she started a 6-month gluten challenge to proceed to endoscopy. During this time her TTG normalized (2.7 U/ml), however her iron deficiency anemia persisted and was refractory to iron supplementation (Hb 90, MCV 65.9). Endoscopy revealed flattened mucosa in D2 but was otherwise normal. Villous blunting in D1 with severe lymphoplasmacytic gastritis in the body with microabscesses was seen on biopsies. H. pylori was negative on Warthin-Starry staining and the pathologist reported a Marsh stage of 3a. Despite the villous blunting, due to the normalized TTG and ongoing epigastric pain, anemia, and presence of lymphoid follicles, a carbon-14 urea breath test was completed which was positive for H. pylori (count rate 286 dpm, normal < 50 dpm). The patient received treatment for H. pylori infection for 14 days with 8 week follow-up revealing a negative breath test. There was complete resolution of symptoms, normalization of laboratory results (Hb 143, MCV 82), and negative TTG at 6 months. Quality improvement review On internal review of the patients seen in celiac clinic as new referrals from June 1 to September 1 2022, 22/55 patients (42%) had already started a full or partial GFD, therefore requiring gluten challenge and delay in diagnostic investigations. Conclusion(s) This case demonstrates the importance of following confirmational testing pathways for CeD. It highlights the role of considering potential causes of false positive TTG and the differential diagnosis of CeD such as H. pylori, NSAIDs, and Crohn’s disease. The identification of 42% of patients referred for suspected CeD who were already on a GFD, suggests a need for improved education of primary care providers to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary life-long gluten elimination diets in children. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207