A58 ENTERIC TUFT CELLS MODULATE LOCAL BUT NOT SYSTEMIC HOST IMMUNE RESPONSES TO CO-ORDINATE TIMELY EXPULSION OF HYMENOLEPIS DIMINUTA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The intestinal tuft cell is a versatile epithelial cell implicated in host detection and defence against enteric nematode and trematode parasites by producing interleukin(IL)-25 and cysteinyl leukotrienes. We have shown that immunocompetent mice develop small intestinal tuft cell hyperplasia during infection with the cestode, Hymenolepis diminuta. Whether tuft cells coordinate murine expulsion of H. diminuta and if this response is similar to other well-established parasitic models is unknown. Purpose To test 1) if tuft cells coordinate host detection and immune responses to H. diminuta; and, 2) if the lack of functional B, T cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) affect tuft cell hyperplasia and expulsion of the parasite. Method Male and female pou2f3-/-/-/+ littermates, rag-1-/- and C57BL6 mice were infected with 5 cysticercoids of H. diminuta. ILC2s were depleted in rag-1-/- with anti-CD90.2 (250μg/mouse, intraperitoneal). At necropsy, small intestines were flushed with cold PBS to count worms. IgG1, IgG2α and mast cell protease-1 (MCPT-1) was measured in serum and supernatants from splenic cells stimulated with ConA (48h) were assessed by ELISA for IL-4, -5, -10 and -13. Doublecortin-like kinase -1 (DCLK-1)+ tuft cells, goblet cells and eosinophils were identified in sections of paraffin embedded or cryopreserved mid-jejunum sections. mRNA of small intestinal epithelium enriched fractions isolated from mice at control and 11 days post-infection (dpi) was evaluated by qPCR. Result(s) Unlike pou2f3+/- and C57Bl6 mice that expel H. diminuta by 8-11 dpi., pou2f3-/- mice harbour H. diminuta at 11 dpi. Pou2f3-/- mice show similar splenic IL-4, -5, -10, -13, and serum IgG1, IgG2a and MCPT-1 levels at 8 dpi. and higher splenic IL-4, -10 at 11 dpi. compared to pou2f3+/- mice. In contrast, pou2f3+/- mice show higher jejunal goblet cell hyperplasia at 8 dpi., higher levels of small intestinal epithelium expression of dclk-1, alox5 and il-25 and jejunal eosinophilia at 11 dpi. compared to pou2f3-/- mice. At 11 dpi, ILCdepletedrag-1-/- develop tuft cell hyperplasia to the same extent as infected PBS/isotype controls and show no trace of intestinal worms in the lumen. Conclusion(s) Enteric tuft cells coordinate rapid expulsion of H. diminuta from mice, but are not essential for the host to detect and develop Th2 systemic responses in response to the worm. However, in the absence of tuft cells, deficiencies are observed in gut-specific effector immune events commonly associated with timely expulsion of enteric helminths; illustrating a disparity between local and systemic immunity following infection with this tapeworm parasite in a non permissive host. The lack of a functional adaptive immune system and surprisingly, depletion of ILC2s, does not completely abrogate worm expulsion or tuft cell hyperplasia in rag-1-/- at 11 dpi. with H. diminuta. This suggests that an innate immune cell population other than CD90.2+ ILC2s amplifies Th2 immunity to H. diminuta-infection. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below Other Please indicate your source of funding; NSERC, , Eyes High doctoral scholarship, Alberta Graduate excellence scholarship Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".