A281 GASTROPARESIS AND FUNCTIONAL GASTROPARESIS IN YOUNG CANADIAN WOMEN: A DETAILED PRACTICE REVIEW IN LONDON, ONTARIO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Gastroparesis is a chronic clinical syndrome characterized by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction causing symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. This condition is heterogenous in its severity and the resulting impact on individuals who experience this diagnosis. Patients with severe gastroparesis symptoms can require extensive pharmacologic and nutritional therapies. Purpose We hope to identify young women (age<50) experiencing gastroparesis in local gastroenterology clinics to describe a group of patients requiring extensive therapeutic support suggestive of a severe subset of this condition. Method Mutual patients with a diagnosis of gastroparesis between a London motility clinic and nutrition clinic were identified. Key patient characteristics including current age, age at diagnosis, current BMI, gastric emptying scan results, the number of prokinetic/anti-constipation/anti-emetic medications ever used, the presence of opioid use, the use of outpatient IV access/IV fluids, the placement of a feeding tube, and the use of total parental nutrition were recorded through a retrospective chart review. Descriptive analyses were performed on the recorded data. Result(s) A total of 26 patient charts were reviewed and 11 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in the analysis. The mean age was 32.7y, the mean age at gastroparesis diagnosis was 28.5y, and the mean body mass index was 22.9kg/m2. Eighty-two percent of these patients have had a gastric emptying scan to confirm their diagnosis, and 36% of them have experienced multiple scans. The mean gastric emptying half-time was 231 minutes and the mean retained gastric content at 4 hours post-ingestion was 39.5%. The mean number of motility medications ever used was 2.2, the mean number of anti-constipation medications ever used was 2.1, and the mean number of anti-emetic medications ever used was 1.5. Fifty-five percent were prescribed opioid medications. The majority of patients identified required advanced nutritional strategies including 45% requiring outpatient IV access and IV fluid hydration, 55% ever using TPN, and 73% ever using a feeding tube. Conclusion(s) We are encountering an increasing number of gastroparesis patients who require intensive therapy and resource allocation. These patients outline the need for further health resources and integration of care from practitioners across multiple disciplines for optimal management. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".