MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323351096 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.235

A235 “WHAT’S SPRUE WITH YOU?”: OLMESARTAN-INDUCED ENTEROPATHY AS AN UNCOMMON MIMICKER OF CELIAC DISEASE

2023· article· en· W4323351096 on OpenAlexaff
Fiona Milne, Christine Orr, Jennifer A. Flemming

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlmesartanEnteropathyMedicineGastroenterologyInternal medicineDuodenitisIntraepithelial lymphocyteDiarrheaVillous atrophyDiscontinuationPathologyCoeliac diseaseDiseaseImmunologyGastritisStomachImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Olmesartan-induced enteropathy is an uncommon mimicker of celiac disease. Symptoms include diarrhea and weight loss and pathology shows villous atrophy, intraepithelial lymphocytes, and subepithelial collagen deposition. In contrast to celiac disease, tissue transglutaminase (TTG) is not elevated and gluten avoidance does not induce clinical or histologic improvement. Both clinical and histologic findings are reversible with cessation of pharmacologic therapy. Purpose To raise clinician awareness of an uncommon but reversible cause of enteropathy. Method A 67-year old man presented with 3 months of progressive diarrhea and 35lb weight loss on a background of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and type 2 diabetes. His medications included olmesartan, amlodipine, metformin, aspirin, and atorvastatin, none of which were new. Infectious stool studies, serum and fecal inflammatory markers, imaging, TTG and IgA were normal. Panendoscopy revealed duodenitis with biopsies consistent with active enteritis, intraepithelial lymphocytosis and villous shortening suggestive of olmesartan-induced enteropathy given negative TTG. Olmesartan was discontinued. Result(s) His symptoms completely resolved over several weeks after discontinuation. Conclusion(s) Olmesartan is an uncommon but reversible mimicker of celiac disease. It was first described in 2012 in a case series of 22 patients, all of whom had negative celiac serology and demonstrated histologic and clinical improvement with cessation of olmesartan. Time from medication initiation to onset of symptoms ranged from 6 months to 7 years, with a mean of 3.1 years. While case reports exist of angiotensin-receptor blockers as causative agents, the most common is olmesartan, implicated in 94% of ARB-induced enteropathy cases in a recent systematic review. The exact mechanism of injury is unknown. The delay in onset of symptoms suggests a cell-mediated immunity phenomenon. An immune-mediated reaction is also supported by the high prevalence of HLA-DQ2/DQ8 haplotypes (71%) among affected individuals vs. 30-40% in the general population. Olmesartan may be implicated more strongly than other ARBs due to its higher affinity for AT1 receptors; theoretically leaving unsaturated AT2 receptors to bind angiotensin. AT2 receptors are known to induce cellular apoptosis, and unopposed cellular death could theoretically lead to villous atrophy. The overall risk of developing enteropathy on olmesartan is rare, but not well quantified. This is likely due to both underrecognition, and variability in study designs leading to inability to perform meta-analysis on currently available data. Data from a French cohort estimates a crude incidence rate of 5.6 per 100,000 person years for patients on olmesartan developing intestinal malabsorption requiring hospitalization. Despite its rarity, prescribers should be cognizant of this side effect which can evolve even after years of medical therapy. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207