MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4323351208 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.085

A85 ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF A DEDICATED RAPID INTERDISCIPLINARY IBD CLINIC ON PATIENT WAIT TIMES, REPORTED OUTCOMES, AND SATISFACTION OF CARE

2023· article· en· W4323351208 on OpenAlexaff
Gajuna Mathiyalagan, Eric K. Broni, R Jogendran, K O'Connor, E Kennedy, A Steiman, Cynthia Maxwell, A Omar, Vincent Piguet, Afsáneh Alavi, Abraham Weizman, V Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsWomen's College Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseReferralUlcerative colitisDiseasePhysical therapyAnxietyPatient Health QuestionnairePatient satisfactionDepression (economics)Internal medicineMental healthFamily medicineSurgeryPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic fluctuating condition where patients can experience periods of active disease and remission. Timely access to care has been shown to be impactful on important disease outcomes. In January 2020, we implemented a rapid assessment IBD program consisting of expedited access to interdisciplinary care and close monitoring of patients. Purpose To assess the impact of the rapid assessment program on access to care, disease activity, and patient satisfaction. Method Once informed consent was obtained, patients were enrolled into the RAPID IBD program. This program consisted of four close monitoring time points at baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months, as well as two follow up time points at 6 and 12 months. At each timepoint patients completed questionnaires that evaluated disease activity, using the Modified Harvey Bradshaw Index (mHBI) for Crohn’s disease (CD), partial Mayo (pMayo) score and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) for ulcerative colitis patients. At baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months, patients were also assessed on mental health, using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), and satisfaction of care, using the CACHE questionnaire. Result(s) Between January 2020 – August 2021, 216 patients were referred to the RAPID IBD program. The mean time from referral to clinical assessment was 8.1 days. Of those referred, 143 (71 CD, 62 UC, 6 IBDU, and 4 Query IBD) patients consented to and completed the 12-month RAPID IBD study. 34.9% of patients who had active disease at baseline achieved remission by 3 months (Table 1). At baseline 44.8% and 28.4% of patients experienced moderate to severe depression and anxiety, respectively. The greatest improvement in mental health was seen at 2 months where the proportion of patients experiencing moderate to severe depression and anxiety decreased to 27.5% and 18.3%, respectively (Table 2). Patient satisfaction, specific to clinical care, improved from a baseline score of 69.1% to 74.1% at 3 months (Table 3). Image Conclusion(s) Implementation of a dedicated RAPID IBD clinic program reveals shorter wait times to be seen in clinic. By three months of enrollment, patients demonstrate improvements in clinical response, mental health, and satisfaction of care. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below Other Please indicate your source of funding; AMO Innovation Funding Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→