MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4323351226 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.153

A153 PYCRL LACTYLATION AS A POTENTIAL REGULATOR OF CANCER STEM CELL METABOLISM IN ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA (ESCC)

2023· article· en· W4323351226 on OpenAlexafffundabout
J Douchin, Luiz G. Almeida, Alexis Gonneaud, Antoine Dufour, Véronique Giroux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCancer stem cellEsophageal cancerCancer researchCancerRadiation therapyStem cellMalignancyCellMedicineOncologyCancer cellChemotherapyCell cultureFlow cytometryInternal medicineBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Patients with esophageal malignancy have a 5-year survival rate of only 14% in Canada. This high mortality rate is due to three factors: late diagnosis, difficulty in surgically removing the tumor because of its localization, and treatment resistance. Resistance can be developed after prolonged exposure to anti-cancer drugs and/or radiation. Indeed 30% of patients will not respond to treatment or will relapse. Resistance has been mainly ascribed to the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) inside the tumor. However, no treatment specifically directed against CSCs is available to patients. Purpose Thus, targeting CSCs is a promising strategy to improve the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the most common type of esophageal cancer worldwide. Therefore, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms occurring during long-term exposure to cancer treatments is imperative. Method Herein, we developed an unbiased approach to identify new players in chemotherapy and radiotherapy resistance development in ESCC. We established radio- (R), chemo- (C), and radiochemo-resistant (RC) human ESCC cell lines using prolonged exposure to radiation and/or chemotherapeutic agent 5-FU, respectively. Result(s) The enrichment in CSCs in all treated cell lines was demonstrated by an increase of ALDH1high cells and CD24high/CD44high cells in flow cytometry. We then used a proteomic approach to identify new players in treatment resistance. Interestingly, pathway analysis pointed out to alterations in energy metabolism as well as amino acid metabolism. Seahorse assays showed that resistant cell lines have a lower respiration rate than control cells, while glycolysis remains unchanged. To further characterize these metabolic changes, we performed an unbiased metabolomic study and confirmed a decrease in amino acid levels such as proline, in resistant cell lines. Recently, metabolic regulation has been linked to a new post-translational modification, lactylation. Proteomic data were re-analyzed looking for lactylated protein and found, amongst others, PYCRL, an enzyme implicated in proline biosynthesis, as one of the most differentially lactylated proteins in treated cell lines compared to control. PYCRL lactylation was confirmed using immuno-fluorescence colocalization and immuno-precipitation. Lastly, using AlphaFold, preliminary results point toward the importance of PYCRL lactylation impairing PYCRL homomultimerization. Conclusion(s) To conclude, our results suggest an important role of proline metabolism following long-term treatment in ESCC. This study is a first step toward the identification of new targets to fight treatment resistance in ESCC patients. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below CAG, CIHR, Other Please indicate your source of funding; FRQ Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→