MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4323351251 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwac036.001

A1 TARGETING IL-4 AND IL-13 TO TREAT CROHN’S DISEASE-ASSOCIATED INTESTINAL FIBROSIS IN SHIP DEFICIENT MICE

2023· article· en· W4323351251 on OpenAlexaff
Katayou Safari, S Menzies, H Jung, Laura M. Sly

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibrosisInflammationMedicineImmune systemCrohn's diseaseImmunologyInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Crohn’s disease (CD) is an immune-mediated disease characterized by chronic, relapsing and remitting, or progressive inflammation of the digestive tract. One in 3 people with CD will develop intestinal fibrosis requiring surgery within 10 years of diagnosis. Biological therapy is effective at reducing inflammation in CD and early and aggressive treatment with biologics will reduce the incidence of fibrosis. However, in children, for whom a step-up approach to therapy is used, and populations that are refractory to biological therapy; fibrosis remains a serious concern. Treatments for intestinal fibrosis are needed as currently, there are no treatment that target intestinal fibrosis directly. Mice deficient in the Src homology 2 domain-containing inositolpolyphosphate 5’-phosphatase (SHIP-/-) develop spontaneous CD-like ileal inflammation and fibrosis. Fibrosis is dependent on PI3Kp110d activity, leading to induction of the enzyme arginase I (argI). Genetic ablation or pharmacologic inhibition of PI3Kp110δ or inhibition of arginase activity block the development of intestinal fibrosis in SHIP-/- mice. IL-4 and IL-13 can activate PI3Kp110δ and IL-4 concentrations are elevated systemically in SHIP-/- mice. Thus, we hypothesize that SHIP-/- mice develop CD-like intestinal fibrosis due to increased IL-4 and/or IL-13 signalling. Purpose Aim 1: To determine whether genetic ablation of IL-4 prevents ileal fibrosis in SHIP-/- mice Aim 2: To determine whether a blocking antibody directed against IL-4 or IL-13 Method SHIP-/- mice were crossed with IL-4 deficient mice (IL-4-/-) to generate wild type, SHIP+/+IL-4-/- SHIP-/-IL-4+/+, and SHIP-/-IL4-/- mice. SHIP-/- mice (6-week-old) were treated with an anti-IL-4 antibody or an anti-IL-13 antibody, IgG isotype control, or PBS (injection control), for 2 weeks. Ileal fibrosis was assessed in SHIP-/- mice comparing mice treated with anti-IL-4 antibody or anti-IL-13 antibody to IgG controls. Measurements of ileal fibrosis included gross and histopathology, muscle thickening, and collagen accumulation (Masson’s trichrome staining for fibrosis). Result(s) SHIP-/-IL-4-/- mice did not have less ileal fibrosis than their SHIP-/- littermates and blocking IL-4 in SHIP-/- mice did not reduce ileal fibrosis. However, blocking IL-13 in SHIP-/- mice reduced ileal fibrosis. Conclusion(s) Blocking IL-4 genetically or with a blocking antibody is insufficient to reduce ileal fibrosis in SHIP-/- mice. Blocking IL-13 with a blocking antibody is sufficient to block the development of ileal fibrosis in SHIP-/- mice. In future experiments, we will cross SHIP-/- mice with IL-13-/- mice to determine whether targeting IL-13 genetically also reduces fibrosis in SHIP-/- mice. We will also determine which receptor IL-13 is signalling through to indue fibrotic pathology in SHIP deficient mice. Our data suggest that an antibody-based biologic targeting IL-13 may be an effective strategy to prevent fibrosis in people with Crohn’s disease. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→