A287 HOME PARENTERAL NUTRITION FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH SHORT BOWEL SYNDROME SECONDARY TO CROHN’S DISEASE VERSUS OTHER ETIOLOGIES: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Individuals with short bowel syndrome (SBS) have reduced intestinal absorptive capacity and many require home parenteral nutrition (PN) support. One of the common causes of SBS is secondary to intestinal resections in the management of Crohn’s disease (CD). Complication rates and survival in SBS secondary to CD on PN versus other etiologies remains unknown. Purpose To determine whether patients with SBS secondary to CD versus SBS secondary to other etiologies on home PN, have increased risk of hospitalizations and complications including central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and venous thromboembolism and whether there is a difference in overall survival between groups. Method This is a multicentre prospective cohort study using the Canadian Home Parenteral Nutrition (HPN) Registry on individuals with defined SBS separated into two cohorts: 1) Patients with SBS secondary to Crohn’s disease vs. 2) Patients with SBS secondary to other aetiologies (trauma, surgical complication, vascular event, volvulus, malignancy). Patient characteristics and clinical factors are presented as mean (standard deviation) for continuous variables and as frequency (percentage) for categorical variables. Comparison between groups (SBS CD vs SBS other) were performed using 2-sample t-test for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher exact tests when appropriate for categorical variable. Survival probabilities will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Result(s) The study included a total of 379 patients with short bowel syndrome on home PN. There are 170 (45%) patients with SBS secondary to CD and 209 (55%) patients with SBS from other secondary causes. The average age of those with CD is 52 and 65% female patients. The average age of those with other causes of SBS is 56 with similar percentage of female patients (65%). There were significant differences in baseline medications with higher use of immunosuppressant therapy (39% vs. 7%, p<0.001) in those with CD. There was no significant difference in total number of hospitalizations, hospitalizations related to PN and CLABSI. Image Conclusion(s) Individuals with SBS secondary to CD do not appear to be at increased risk of central line infections or hospitalizations compared those with SBS from other causes. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".