A148 CASE REPORT: ASSOCIATION OF HOUSE DUST MITE ALLERGY AND REMISSION OF EOSINOPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS AFTER ELIMINATION OF SHRIMP
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a complex, chronic, allergic disease that commonly presents as dysphagia in young adults. Co-occurring allergic or atopic disease, including food allergies and asthma are seen in approximately 70% of cases. Allergy to house dust mite (HDM) tropomyosin, Der p 10, and cross-reactivity to shrimp has been well described. We discuss a presentation of EoE in the setting of positive HDM skin prick testing that subsequently improved with dietary elimination of shrimp, that has never been described in the literature. Purpose To highlight an underlying mechanism in EoE and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to this disease. Method A 45-year-old male with a medical history significant for ulcerative colitis (diagnosed two years prior and maintained in deep endoscopic remission with adalimumab) and asthma (with seasonal, rare usage of budesonide and formoterol inhaler) was seen by his outpatient gastroenterologist following three weeks of new-onset dysphagia and subjective intermittent food bolus impaction. The patient was pre-emptively started on daily proton pump inhibitor prior to endoscopy, but discontinued this within less than two weeks as he felt like it induced loose bowel movements. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed and revealed proximal esophageal furrows. Histology of esophageal biopsies was compatible with EoE: distal esophagus >100 eosinophils/hpf with eosinophil degranulation, mid and proximal esophagus >25 eosinophils/hpf with eosinophil degranulation. The patient self-identified that his episodes of dysphagia and food bolus impaction were associated with shrimp ingestion, thus he eliminated shrimp from his diet. Result(s) Two-month clinical follow-up demonstrated symptomatic remission despite no other active treatment or additional food elimination. Consultation with an allergist demonstrated the patient had positive skin prick testing to HDM (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and farina) but negative testing to shrimp, despite clinical improvement with dietary shrimp elimination. Thus his EoE was attributed to HDM cross-reactivity, specifically to the Der p 10 antigen. Follow-up EGD and biopsy to confirm endoscopic and histologic remission with shrimp elimination is scheduled in two months. Conclusion(s) This is the first case description of a patient with new onset EoE attributed to Der p 10, in the setting of positive skin prick to HDM and negative skin prick to shrimp, with subsequent symptomatic resolution of EoE following dietary shrimp elimination. Shrimp and HDM share a protein, Der p 10. Der p 10 is commonly the culprit antigen in patients that have allergic reactions to HDM and (or) shrimp, but often only demonstrate positive skin prick testing to HDM (with negative testing to shrimp). This case demonstrates a role for involvement of an allergist and skin prick testing in select cases of EoE, as this may result in a relatively simple food elimination and avoidance of further therapeutic interventions. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".