Factors Determining TFP Increase in Small-Scale Lowland Rice Farming
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rice is a strategic commodity, so the Government of Indonesia puts forward the standard of building a globally competitive rice farming model by increasing the Total Factor Productivity (TFP).However, until now, farm managers have had a relatively shallow understanding of the TFP concept.This study, focusing on lowland rice farming in Indonesia, identifies the factors that determine the development of the TFP.The main questions in this research are, what are the impacts of farming scale, technical efficiency, allocative efficiency, and the efficiency scale?Has lowland rice farming adopted technology to reduce wasting resources due to an inefficient use of inputs?This study used 329 cross-sectional pieces of data on small-scale rice farming.The research results indicate that lowland rice farming is in a decreasing return condition and that there is technical inefficiency.TFP tends to increase when the farm scale increases.Technical efficiency, allocative efficiency, and scale of efficiency are the main determining factors in developing TFP at the level of lowland rice farmers; of these, technical efficiency is the most important factor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it