MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323362510 · doi:10.1038/s41408-023-00805-x

Daratumumab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory myeloma: final analysis of PLEIADES and EQUULEUS

2023· letter· en· W4323362510 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe Moreau, Ajai Chari, Albert Oriol, Joaquín Martínez‐López, Mathias Haenel, Cyrille Touzeau, Sikander Ailawadhi, Britta Besemer, Javier de la Rubia, Cristina Encinas, María‐Victoria Mateos, Hans Salwender, Paula Rodríguez‐Otero, Cyrille Hulin, Lionel Karlin, Anna Sureda, Joan Bargay, Lotfi Benboubker, Laura Rosiñol, Stefano Tarantolo, Howard R. Terebelo, Shiyi Yang, Jianping Wang, Ivo Nnane, Ming Qi, Michele Kosh, Maria Delioukina, Hartmut Goldschmidt

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Cancer Journal · 2023
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
FundersJanssen Research and DevelopmentNational Cancer InstituteAmgen
KeywordsDaratumumabCarfilzomibPleiadesDexamethasoneMedicineOncologyMultiple myelomaInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)LenalidomideBiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Daratumumab is approved in many countries as monotherapy and in combination regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Daratumumab-based combinations have also demonstrated encouraging efficacy in lenalidomide-refractory RRMM [ 4 , 5 ]. Carfilzomib is approved as monotherapy and in combination regimens, including daratumumab and dexamethasone (D-Kd), for RRMM [ 6 ]. In the phase 3 CANDOR study, D-Kd (intravenous [IV] daratumumab; carfilzomib 56 mg/m 2 twice weekly) improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus Kd in the overall population and lenalidomide-refractory patients [ 7 , 8 ]. In the phase 3 A.R.R.O.W. study, once-weekly carfilzomib (70 mg/m 2 ) significantly prolonged PFS versus twice-weekly carfilzomib (27 mg/m 2 ), providing a safe and more convenient Kd dosing regimen [ 9 ].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood Cancer JournalSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207