Summary of the Evidence for the Management of Nebulized Inhalation in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective : To summarize the best evidence on the management of aerosol inhalation in children, and to provide reference for clinical practice. Methods : According to the ‘6S’ model of evidence resources, systematically searched British Medical Journal Best Practice (BMJ Best Practice), PubMed, American Clinical Guidelines Network (AHRQ), Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Guidelines Library (SIGN), and international guideline books. Library (GIN), Canadian Medical Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Repository (CMACPG), National Health and Medical Research Council Australia Guidelines Repository (NHMRC), National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Guidelines Repository (NICE), Evidence-Based Medicine Library (Cochrane Library), Netherlands Medical Abstracts Database (Embase), Ovid-Medline, EBSCO-CINAHL, JBI, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, European Society of Respiratory Therapy, American Society of Respiratory Therapy, Wanfang, VIP, CNKI, Medlive(Yi Mai Tong), and Sino Med. The literature resources include clinical practice guidelines, expert consensus, evidence summary, and systematic review of children’s aerosol inhalation. Two researchers independently conducted quality evaluation, evidence extraction, and evidence integration of the literature. Results : A total of 11 papers were included, including 2 guidelines, 6 expert consensus papers, 1 systematic review, and 2 evidence summaries; finally, 6 evidence themes were formed: principles of aerosol drug use, selection of aerosol devices, effects of aerosolization factors of nebulization effect, management during nebulization treatment, infection control; a total of 34 evidence opinions. Conclusion : The summarized evidence on children’s aerosol inhalation can be applied to clinical practice according to the actual clinical situation, promote the standardized management of children’s aerosol inhalation, and improve the therapeutic effect of aerosolization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.074 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.016 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".