The Effectiveness of Botanical Pesticide as Antifungal on Chili (Capsicum annum L) Disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Colletotrichum sp. and Phytophthora capsici are a causative diseases in chili, they are causing damage up to 50%.Inorganic pesticides are commonly used to treat the diseases, but there are many impacts to plant and consumers of chili.As an alternative, botanical pesticide such as Colletotrichum sp. and Phytophthora capsici are developed massively, since they are good for consumer health.The aim of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of various botanical extract of Jatropha curcas, Toona sureni, Pangium edule, Syzygium aromaticum and Cymbopogon citratus L as natural antifungal against the Colletotrichum sp. and Phytophthora capsici.The results showed that the inhibition on colony development of Colletotrichum sp. and Phytophthora capsici tested was significant.Extract of P. edule inhibited of Colletotrichum sp.growth at 6 DAI up to 74.06% and P.capsici up to 24.03%.At the same times observation (6 DAI) C. citratus L extract inhibited up to 44.38% colony growth of Colletotrichum sp. and 86.82% colony of P. capsici.Extract of Syzygium aromaticum showed the perfect inhibition (100%) on mycelial growth for P. capsici and 91.71% for Colletotrichum sp.Whereas, J. Curcas and T. sureni extract showed insignificant effect for all fungal pathogen.We are presumed that it because the bioactive compound of the extract.In this research we found that the main compounds of S. aromaticum is eugenol up to 70.97% that we know as antimicrobial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it