Les barons perchés : essai sur l'émergence des mélanges dans la littérature juridique québécoise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On excusera, je l'espère, ma tentative de fabriquer de toutes pièces un lien de filiation intellectuelle avec le professeur Sylvio Normand en le remerciant d'avoir participé -d'abord sans le savoir, puis avec enthousiasme et générosité -à l'élaboration et à l'amélioration de cet article.J'aimerais également exprimer ma gratitude à M es Daniel Boyer et Daniel Jutras pour leurs judicieux conseils lors de la conception de ce projet de recherche.† B.C.L., J.D., B.A.; étudiante à l'École normale supérieure (Paris) et candidate à la maîtrise en théorie et analyse du droit à l'Université Paris Nanterre.272 Noémie GOURDE-BOUCHARD much more than mere collections of contributions, is characterized by specific paratextual elements, and reflects the way legal scholars see and present themselves, as well as the relationships between the various members of that community.Mélanges can thus be viewed as sites of self-expression and identity assertion for Quebec law professors; they allow them to tell their stories and to further establish their authority both in the academic world and within the legal community.These collections of contributions, since they are most often embellished with descriptions of the qualities of the dedicatees, paint a portrait of the ideal academic jurist.They portray these celebrated individuals as largerthan-life characters, bringing distinction to their law faculties and even to the wider legal world throughout Quebec and the rest of Canada.A partir de los años 60, los mélanges (Festschriften), o tomohomenaje -esos recueils o compendios de estudios que los investigadores ofrecen a sus colegas con motivo de un aniversario o una jubilación -se han arraigado en la literatura jurídica de Quebec, antes de multiplicarse durante los años 1990 y 2000.El estudio de los primeros mélanges jurídicos en Quebec permite revisar la historia de la doctrina en un momento crucial, a saber, la profesionalización de los profesores de Derecho y la aparición de un verdadero « cuerpo » de juristas universitarios.Mucho más que simples colecciones de artículos, las obras pertenecientes a este particular género literario se caracterizan por elementos paratextuales precisos, y dan testimonio de las representaciones que los juristas universitarios hacen de sí mismos, así como de las relaciones que mantienen entre ellos.Los « mélanges » aparecen, como lugares de expresión y reivindicación identitaria para los profesores de Derecho de Quebec; les permiten contar sus vivencias y establecer aún más su autoridad tanto en el mundo académico como dentro de la comunidad jurídica.Estas compilaciones de artículos, dado que la mayoría de las veces están adornadas con descripciones de las cualidades de los dedicatarios, bosquejan un retrato del jurista académico ideal.Ellos representan a esos célebres personajes como seres extraordinarios, que dan gloria a su Facultad de Derecho, de hecho, a todo el derecho quebequense o canadiense.SOMMAIRE Introduction ..............................
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".