MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323521513 · doi:10.7202/1096758ar

Constitution de la République de l’Équateur (2008) : les innovations du néo-constitutionnalisme équatorien

2023· article· fr· W4323521513 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Otilia Del Carmen Puiggros

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers du CIÉRA · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Cultures and History
Canadian institutionsSaint Paul UniversityUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceConstitutionPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le désenchantement à l’endroit du modèle occidental de développement fait apparaître un autre mode de vie en société dans la région des Andes. Enraciné dans la culture ancestrale du sumak kawsay, le buen vivir (« bien-vivre », BV) postule un mode de vie en harmonie avec la nature et inclusif des savoirs autochtones. En intégrant le BV, la nouvelle Constitution Montecristi de de 2008 fait place au « néo-constitutionnalisme » équatorien, lequel équilibre les droits individuels et les droits collectifs et crée un précédent mondial reconnaissant des droits à la nature. Notre article fait un bref survol de quelques articles de la Constitution de Montecristi (2008), qui propose le passage d’un État uninational à un État plurinational et pluriculturel, reconnaît des droits à la nature et les droits culturels des peuples autochtones tout en se basant sur la conception kelsénienne du droit positif.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.015
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers du CIÉRASame topicIndigenous Cultures and HistoryFrench-language works237,207