Genome‐wide association studies for additive and dominance effects for body composition traits in commercial crossbred Piétrain pigs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fat depth (FD) and muscle depth (MD) are economically important traits and used to estimate carcass lean content (LMP), which is one of the main breeding objectives in pig breeding programmes. We assessed the genetic architectures of body composition traits for additive and dominance effects in commercial crossbred Piétrain pigs using both 50 K array and sequence genotypes. We first performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) using single-marker association analysis with a false discovery rate of 0.1. Then, we estimated the additive and dominance effects of the most significant variant in the quantitative trait loci (QTL) regions. It was investigated whether the use of whole-genome sequence (WGS) will improve the QTL detection (both additive and dominance) with a higher power compared with lower density SNP arrays. Our results showed that more QTL regions were detected by WGS compared with 50 K array (n = 54 vs. n = 17). Of the novel associated regions associated with FD and LMP and detected by WGS, the most pronounced peak was on SSC13, situated at ~116-118, 121-127 and 129-134 Mbp. Additionally, we found that only additive effects contributed to the genetic architecture of the analysed traits and no significant dominance effects were found for the tested SNPs at QTL regions, regardless of panel density. The associated SNPs are located in or near several relevant candidate genes. Of these genes, GABRR2, GALR1, RNGTT, CDH20 and MC4R have been previously reported as being associated with fat deposition traits. However, the genes on SSC1 (ZNF292, ORC3, CNR1, SRSF12, MDN1, TSHZ1, RELCH and RNF152) and SSC18 (TTC26 and KIAA1549) have not been reported previously to our best knowledge. Our current findings provide insights into the genomic regions influencing composition traits in Piétrain pigs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".