MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323533996 · doi:10.1128/msphere.00478-22

Evidence for a Causal Role for Escherichia coli Strains Identified as Adherent-Invasive (AIEC) in Intestinal Inflammation

2023· article· en· W4323533996 on OpenAlexafffund
Hatem Kittana, João Carlos Gomes‐Neto, Kari Heck, Anthony F. Juritsch, Jason Sughroue, Yibo Xian, Sara Mantz, Rafael R. Segura Muñoz, Liz A. Cody, Robert Schmaltz, Christopher L. Anderson, Rodney A. Moxley, Jesse M. Hostetter, Samodha C. Fernando, Jennifer Clarke, Stephen D. Kachman, Clayton E. Cressler, Andrew K. Benson, Jens Walter, Amanda E. Ramer‐Tait

Bibliographic record

VenuemSphere · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesOffice of Research and Economic Development, University of Nebraska-LincolnNational Institutes of HealthInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnMcMaster UniversityCrohn's and Colitis FoundationUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsEscherichia coliInflammationMicrobiologyBiologyImmunologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

. Many species in this phylum are thought to contribute to disease under certain conditions, including adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) strains, which are enriched in some patients. However, whether this bloom contributes to disease or is just a response to IBD-associated physiological changes is unknown. Although assigning causality is challenging, appropriate animal models can test the hypothesis that AIEC strains have an enhanced ability to cause colitis in comparison to other gut commensal E. coli strains and to identify bacterial traits contributing to virulence. We observed that AIEC strains are generally more pathogenic than commensal E. coli and that bacterial intracellular survival/replication phenotypes contributed to disease. We also found that E. coli strains lacking primary virulence traits can prevent inflammation. Our findings provide critical information on E. coli pathogenicity that may inform development of IBD diagnostic tools and therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemSphereSame topicGut microbiota and healthFrench-language works237,207