MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4323537830 · doi:10.1117/1.nph.10.2.023518

Reproducibility of infant fNIRS studies: a meta-analytic approach

2023· article· en· W4323537830 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jessica Gemignani, Irene de la Cruz‐Pavía, Anna Martinez, Caroline Nallet, Alessia Pasquini, Gaia Lucarini, Francesca Cavicchiolo, Judit Gervain

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurophotonics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Animal Learning Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónIkerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science
KeywordsNeuroimagingSample size determinationReproducibilityPsychologyCognitive psychologyContrast (vision)Meta-analysisRepetition (rhetorical device)Multiple comparisons problemAudiologyDevelopmental psychologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceStatisticsNeuroscienceMedicineMathematicsLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmaMetaresearchMeta-epidemiology (broad)
Domain: Reproducibility · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Meta-analysishigh
gptMetaresearchMeta-epidemiology (broad)
Domain: Reproducibility · Genre: Review
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Meta-analysishigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.128
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.240
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1280.240
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.047
Bibliometrics0.0100.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.190
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

Study designMeta-analysis
DomainReproducibility
GenreEmpirical · Review

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurophotonics→Same topicChild and Animal Learning Development→CategoryMetaresearch→French-language works237,207→