PERSEPSI SISWA TERHADAP PEMBELAJARAN REMEDIAL PADA MATA PELAJARAN EKONOMI DI SMA NEGERI 1 TANAH PUTIH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui persepsi siswa terhadap pembelajaran remedial pada mata pelajaran ekonomi kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Tanah Putih tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMA Negeri 1 Tanah putih pada bulan Maret 2019, subjek penelitian ini adalah guru ekonomi dan siswa kelas X jurusan MIPA di SMA Negeri 1 Tanah Putih sebanyak 42 orang. Pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan angket dan wawancara. Angket terdiri dari 36 pernyataan dan siswa menjawab bentuk tes ulang yang terdiri dari 7 butir pertanyaan. Berdasarkan analisis deskriptif tes ulang mengenai persepsi siswa terhadap pembelajaran remedial pada mata pelajaran ekonomi yang menjawab sangat setuju 138 responden, setuju 84 responden, kurang setuju 37 responden, tidak setuju 34 responden. Berdasarkan analisis data, maka disimpulkan bahwa skor rata-rata tentang tes ulang yaitu 1,37 dengan kategori sangat rendah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".