MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PERSEPSI SISWA TERHADAP PEMBELAJARAN REMEDIAL PADA MATA PELAJARAN EKONOMI DI SMA NEGERI 1 TANAH PUTIH

2021· article· id· W4323647147 on OpenAlex
Nureni Ramadiana, Nurhuda

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePEKA · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui persepsi siswa terhadap pembelajaran remedial pada mata pelajaran ekonomi kelas X di SMA Negeri 1 Tanah Putih tahun ajaran 2018/2019. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMA Negeri 1 Tanah putih pada bulan Maret 2019, subjek penelitian ini adalah guru ekonomi dan siswa kelas X jurusan MIPA di SMA Negeri 1 Tanah Putih sebanyak 42 orang. Pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan angket dan wawancara. Angket terdiri dari 36 pernyataan dan siswa menjawab bentuk tes ulang yang terdiri dari 7 butir pertanyaan. Berdasarkan analisis deskriptif tes ulang mengenai persepsi siswa terhadap pembelajaran remedial pada mata pelajaran ekonomi yang menjawab sangat setuju 138 responden, setuju 84 responden, kurang setuju 37 responden, tidak setuju 34 responden. Berdasarkan analisis data, maka disimpulkan bahwa skor rata-rata tentang tes ulang yaitu 1,37 dengan kategori sangat rendah.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it