MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323652326 · doi:10.1681/asn.0000000000000105

Hemodialysis-Related Acute Brain Injury Demonstrated by Application of Intradialytic Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy

2023· article· en· W4323652326 on OpenAlexaff
Udunna Anazodo, Dickson Wong, Jean Théberge, Madeleine T. Dacey, Janice Gomes, Jarrin D. Penny, Michael van Ginkel, Stefan E. Poirier, Christopher W. McIntyre

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingMedicineWhite matterCardiologyCerebral blood flowInternal medicineHemodialysisDiffusion MRIIschemiaAnesthesiaPathologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Hemodialysis (HD) results in reduced brain blood flow, and HD-related circulatory stress and regional ischemia are associated with brain injury over time. However, studies to date have not provided definitive direct evidence of acute brain injury during a HD treatment session. Using intradialytic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and spectroscopy to examine HD-associated changes in brain structure and neurochemistry, the authors found that multiple white (WM) tracts had diffusion imaging changes characteristic of cytotoxic edema, a consequence of ischemic insult and a precursor to fixed structural WM injury. Spectroscopy showed decreases in prefrontal N -acetyl aspartate (NAA) and choline concentrations consistent with energy deficit and perfusion anomaly. This suggests that one HD session can cause brain injury and that studies of interventions that mitigate this treatment's effects on the brain are warranted. BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) treatment-related hemodynamic stress results in recurrent ischemic injury to organs such as the heart and brain. Short-term reduction in brain blood flow and long-term white matter changes have been reported, but the basis of HD-induced brain injury is neither well-recognized nor understood, although progressive cognitive impairment is common. METHODS: We used neurocognitive assessments, intradialytic anatomical magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to examine the nature of acute HD-associated brain injury and associated changes in brain structure and neurochemistry relevant to ischemia. Data acquired before HD and during the last 60 minutes of HD (during maximal circulatory stress) were analyzed to assess the acute effects of HD on the brain. RESULTS: We studied 17 patients (mean age 63±13 years; 58.8% were male, 76.5% were White, 17.6% were Black, and 5.9% were of Indigenous ethnicity). We found intradialytic changes, including the development of multiple regions of white matter exhibiting increased fractional anisotropy with associated decreases in mean diffusivity and radial diffusivity-characteristic features of cytotoxic edema (with increase in global brain volumes). We also observed decreases in proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy-measured N -acetyl aspartate and choline concentrations during HD, indicative of regional ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that significant intradialytic changes in brain tissue volume, diffusion metrics, and brain metabolite concentrations consistent with ischemic injury occur in a single dialysis session. These findings raise the possibility that HD might have long-term neurological consequences. Further study is needed to establish an association between intradialytic magnetic resonance imaging findings of brain injury and cognitive impairment and to understand the chronic effects of HD-induced brain injury. CLINICAL TRIALS INFORMATION: NCT03342183 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207