Hepatic Inflammatory pseudotumor differentiated from malignant hepatic tumor: A case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
70歳男性，HBV既感染．単純USにて低/等/低エコー，単純CTにて低/等/低吸収（double-target-sign）を呈する3.8 cm大腫瘤精査で入院．動脈相では，造影CTとEOB MRIは造影効果が弱く，造影USでは多血性．造影US門脈相で早期washout，Kupffer相で欠損像を示した．更に，EOB MRI肝細胞相で腫瘤部は中心部よりは信号の高い低信号，echo planar imaging-free induction decay像で著明な低信号を示すなど，多彩な画像所見を呈した．画像上，炎症性偽腫瘍，非定型肝細胞癌，胆管細胞癌，細胆管細胞癌，転移性肝腫瘍が鑑別に挙がった．
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".