MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4323657626 · doi:10.2118/212813-ms

Static Gradient Survey Reveals Temperature Anomaly in the CaMI CO2 Injection Well

2023· article· en· W4323657626 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hamid Behmanesh, Joanna K. Cooper, Marie Macquet, Brendan Kolkman-Quinn, Don C. Lawton, Kirk Osadetz, Greg Maidment

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryCarbon Management Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemperature measurementTemperature gradientBoreholeWirelineWellboreMaterials scienceMechanicsGeologyPetroleum engineeringGeotechnical engineeringMeteorologyEngineeringThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In view of the complex wellbore dynamics associated with liquid/vapor CO2 in the Containment and Monitoring Institute (CaMI) of Carbon Management Canada (CMC) CO2 injection wellbore, a Static Gradient Survey was conducted with the focus on the verification of in-tubing pressures and temperatures at various depths in the wellbore. Specifically, the knowledge sought was to learn about the temperature profile in the regions above and below the gas-liquid interface as well as the temperature profile below the Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS) fiber termination point in the well, where there is no temperature measurement. For the static gradient survey, four surveys (passes) were conducted over a span of 6 hours, using tandem pressure/temperature recorders. For the first and second passes, lowering and raising the wireline string in and out of the well at a steady rate was undertaken. The third pass involved stopping the gauges at specified depths for approximately 10 minutes prior to extracting them out of the wellbore. Recognizing that the responses of the gauges to temperature were much slower than to pressure, the duration of the stops varied at different depths, depending on the location of interest. The final pass took place some 6 hours after the initial run. The location of the liquid level in the well was identified, not only by the change in pressure gradients but also by a change in temperature gradients. At the gas-liquid interface, the liquid was boiling and caused localized cooling around the interface. This cooling event was registered in the DTS data where the temperature departed from the baseline temperature gradient. Another cooling event was observed near the base of the wellbore where the recorded temperature profile cooled before it again approached the normal thermal gradient. We interpreted the cause of this cooling event to be that some of the injected CO2 has migrated up-section into the shallower formation. The corresponding decrease of pressure caused a phase change and evaporation of CO2 which resulted in a reduction in the CO2 temperature. The temperature anomaly at the base of the injection well is consistent with the geophysical monitoring results from vertical seismic profiles (VSP) and the borehole electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) surveys. Understanding of the thermal processes related to Geologic Carbon Storage(GCS) is crucial for a successful deployment of projects. Our observations of temperature anomalies within the reservoir will contribute to the feasibility of employing temperature signals as a monitoring tool for the subsurface migration of the CO2 plume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207