Central retinal microvasculature damage is associated with orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a common non-motor symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD). OH can cause cerebral and retinal hypoperfusion and is associated with microvascular damage in PD. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a non-invasive technology that can be used to visualize the retinal microvasculature and detect microvascular damage in PD. In the present study, 51 PD patients (OH+, n = 20, 37 eyes; OH-, n = 32, 61 eyes) and 51 healthy controls (100 eyes) were evaluated. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III, Hoehn and Yahr scale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, levodopa equivalent daily dose, and vascular risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, were investigated. PD patients underwent a head-up tilt (HUT) test. The PD patients had a lower superficial retinal capillary plexus (SRCP) density in the central region than control patients. The PDOH+ group had lower vessel density in the SRCP of the central region compared with the control group and lower vessel density in the DRCP of the central region than the PDOH- and control groups. The changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure during the HUT test in PD patients showed a negative correlation with the vessel density in the DRCP central region. The presence of OH was a critical factor associated with central microvasculature damage in PD. These findings indicate that OCTA can be a useful and non-invasive tool for detecting microvasculature damage in PD patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".